View:

Download DOC

Download PDF

Download XLS

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2001

or

	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                to                .

Commission File Number: 000-26489

MCM CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

(877) 445-4581

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the last 90 days.

Yes     No  

      There were 7,161,131 shares of common stock outstanding as of April 30, 2001.

Table of Contents

MCM CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q

1

Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Financial Statements

MCM CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

2

Table of Contents

MCM CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

3

Table of Contents

MCM CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

4

Table of Contents

MCM CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

Note 1 — Basis of Presentation

      MCM Capital Group, Inc. (“MCM”) is a Delaware holding company whose principal assets are its investments in its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Midland Credit Management, Inc., Midland Receivables 98-1 Corporation, Midland Funding 98-A Corporation, Midland Receivables 99-1 Corporation, Midland Acquisition Corporation and MRC Receivables Corporation (collectively referred to herein as the “Company”). We are a financial services company specializing in the collection, restructuring, resale and securitization of receivable portfolios acquired at deep discounts.

      The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and, therefore, do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. In the opinion of the Company, however, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position as of December 31, 2000 and March 31, 2001, its results of operations for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2000 and 2001 and its cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2000 and 2001. This information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain statements in these notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements constitute “forward-looking statements” under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements express or implied by such forward-looking statements. See “Part II-Other Information.”

Note 2 — Investment in Receivable Portfolios

      We account for our investment in receivable portfolios on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with the provisions of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”) Practice Bulletin 6, “Amortization of Discounts on Certain Acquired Loans.” Static pools are established with accounts having similar attributes, based on the specific seller and timing of acquisition. Once a static pool is established, the receivables are permanently assigned to the pool. The discount (i.e., the difference between the cost of each static pool and the related aggregate contractual receivable balance) is not recorded because we expect to collect a relatively small percentage of each static pool’s contractual receivable balance. As a result, each static pool is recorded at cost at the time of acquisition.

      We account for each static pool as a unit for the economic life of the pool (similar to one loan) for recognition of income from receivable portfolios, for collections applied to principal of receivable portfolios and for provision for loss or impairment. Income from receivable portfolios has been accrued based on the effective interest rate determined for each pool applied to each pool’s original cost basis, adjusted for unpaid accrued income and principal paydowns. The effective interest rate is the internal rate of return determined based on the timing and amounts of actual cash received and anticipated future cash flow projections for each pool.

      During the first quarter of 2000, we determined that twenty-two of our receivable portfolios that had been acquired during 1999 and 2000 were not performing in a manner consistent with expectations and historical results for the specific type of receivables within those portfolios. This non-performance was largely the result of non-compliance of the receivable portfolios purchased with covenants and representations contained in the related purchasing contracts. At the time impairment was identified the Company was unable to reasonably

5

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

estimate the amount and timing of anticipated collections. Therefore, in accordance with AICPA Practice Bulletin 6, the Company ceased accrual of income on these portfolios effective January 1, 2000.

      During the second quarter of 2000, using newly acquired proprietary statistical models, Company management estimated the amount and timing of anticipated collections, and therefore the recoverable value of these portfolios. As part of that process, we were able to isolate many of the portions of those portfolios containing what we considered ineligible assets. Based on our calculations and statistical analysis, we recorded impairment charges of $20.9 million against the carrying value of certain portfolios for the year 2000. At March 31, 2001, these portfolios remain on non-accrual status, and the full amount of collections for these portfolios continues to be applied to the principal of these receivable portfolios. In accordance with AICPA Practice Bulletin 6, we are accounting for these portfolios under the cost recovery method until such time that we can demonstrate our ability to accurately estimate the amount and timing of anticipated collections. For those portfolios on non-accrual status, collections in excess of the remaining net value of the related individual receivable portfolios are recorded as income. During the quarter ended March 31, 2001, approximately $1.3 million was recognized as income pertaining to collections on portfolios on which the related net book value has been fully recovered.

      We monitor impairment of receivable portfolios based on total projected future cash flows of each portfolio compared to each portfolio’s carrying value. Each quarter, management evaluates the carrying value of receivable portfolios for impairment based on current market conditions and cash flow assumptions. Provisions for losses are charged to earnings when it is determined that the investment in a receivable portfolio is greater than the related estimates of total probable future collections. During the year ended December 31, 2000, we recorded impairment charges of approximately $20.9 million against the carrying value of the portfolios. Approximately $2.1 million of this impairment was recognized in the first quarter of 2000. The Company did not record an impairment charge during the quarter ended March 31, 2001.

      The following table summarizes the changes in the balance of the investment in receivable portfolios for the following periods (in thousands):

Note 3 — Securitization of Receivable Portfolios

  1998 Securitization/ Sale

      On December 30, 1998, Midland Receivables 98-1 Corporation, a bankruptcy-remote, special-purpose subsidiary of Midland Credit Management, Inc. (Midland Credit), issued non-recourse notes in the principal amount of $33.0 million, which were repaid in full on September 11, 2000. The 1998 Securitization was accounted for as a sale under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 125 “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities” (SFAS

6

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

No. 125). We recorded a retained interest and a servicing liability and recognized a gain of approximately $9.3 million in 1998. The servicing liability was fully amortized in September 2000 in connection with repayment of the notes.

      The retained interest is carried at fair value with the difference between fair value and cost basis recorded as unrealized gain and included in other comprehensive income as a component of stockholders’ equity. In estimating the fair value of the retained interest, we estimated net cash flows, after repayment of notes, related interest and other fees, based on our historical collection results for similar receivables and assumed a discount rate of 30% per annum and collections through July 2004. Based on these assumptions, the retained interest is estimated to yield a monthly return of approximately 3.6%. The income accrued on the retained interest was $2.5 million and $2.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2000 and 2001 respectively. Since repaying the notes in September 2000, all collections of the underlying securitized receivables have been applied against the principal and interest of the retained interest.

      The following table summarizes the changes in the balance of the retained interest for the three months ended March 31, 2001 (in thousands):

  1999 Warehouse Financing

      On March 31, 1999, Midland Credit, through a bankruptcy remote, special purpose subsidiary, entered into a $35.0 million securitized receivables acquisition facility or “warehouse facility”. As of March 31, 2001, there is a balance outstanding under this facility of $10.3 million. The original terms of the warehouse facility provided for a two-year revolving funding period that was to expire April 15, 2001. As a result of portfolio performance issues as measured on September 30, 2000, the Company was in default with respect to Securitization 99-1 and the warehouse facility. Accordingly, the terms of Securitization 99-1 and the warehouse facility were amended as of October 1, 2000. The amendments provide, among other things, that Midland Credit (i) must maintain $2 million of liquidity, (ii) must collect certain minimum amounts on the receivable portfolios within the warehouse facility and Securitization 99-1, (iii) must maintain on a consolidated basis a minimum net worth of an amount that decreases on a quarterly basis from $13 million to $7.3 million, over the period from September 30, 2000 through September 30, 2001 and remains at $7.3 million thereafter, (iv) must be reappointed as servicer by the note insurer on a monthly basis subsequent to December 31, 2000, (v) was granted greater flexibility in the sale of certain accounts and the use of third party collectors and (vi) will receive increased servicing fees, paid on a weekly basis. In addition, the amendments increase the interest rate on notes (i) in Securitization 99-1 to 10% and (ii) the warehouse facility to one week LIBOR plus 117 basis points. The warehouse facility was also converted to a term loan with a final payment date of December 15, 2004. Midland Credit is also required to pay to the noteholders any recoveries after September 22, 2000, net of attorney fees and certain costs, from certain issuers that sold the securitized receivables to Midland Credit. The Company has been reappointed as servicer through May 31, 2001.

7

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

  1999 Securitization/ Financing

      On January 18, 2000, Midland Receivables 99-1 Corporation, a bankruptcy remote, special purpose subsidiary of Midland Credit, issued non-recourse notes in the amount of $28.9 million, bearing interest at 9.63% per annum (“Securitization 99-1”). The notes are collateralized by certain charged-off receivables with a carrying amount of approximately $43.0 million at the time of transfer and an initial cash reserve account of $1.4 million and are insured through a financial guaranty insurance policy. The securitization has been accounted for as a financing transaction and the proceeds were used to reduce the level of outstanding borrowings of the warehouse facility, discussed below. Income is being recognized over the estimated life of the securitized receivables and the receivables and corresponding debt remain on our balance sheet. The assets pledged in Securitization 99-1, together with their associated cash flows, would not be available to satisfy claims of the Company’s general creditors. At March 31, 2001, the balance outstanding under these non-recourse notes was $17.6 million. The Company has been reappointed as servicer through May 31, 2001.

Note 4 — Property and Equipment

      The following is a summary of the components of property and equipment (in thousands):

Note 5 — Notes Payable and Other Borrowings

      The Company is obligated under borrowings as follows (in thousands):

  Line of Credit

      Effective December 30, 2000, we entered into the Fifth Amended and Restated Promissory Note to renew our revolving line of credit. The $15.0 million revolving line of credit carries interest at the Prime Rate and matures on April 15, 2002 with the right to extend to April 15, 2003 upon payment of an extension fee of

8

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

$150,000 and compliance with certain other conditions. Under this revolving credit facility, there was a balance outstanding as of March 31, 2001 of $13.2 million and there were $2.1 million and $1.8 million of borrowing availability as of December 31, 2000 and March 31, 2001, respectively. Borrowings under this unsecured revolving line of credit are guaranteed by certain stockholders of MCM, including Triarc Companies, Inc. (Triarc). Triarc placed $15.0 million of United States government debt securities in a custodian account at the lending bank, which is subject to set off under certain circumstances if the parties to the bank guaranties and to related agreements fail to perform their obligations thereunder.

  Senior Notes

      On January 12, 2000, we issued $10.0 million in principal amount of 12% Series No. 1 Senior Notes to an institutional investor. We used the net proceeds of the Senior Notes for general operating expenses. Although the Senior Notes are unsecured obligations of MCM they are guaranteed by Midland Credit and Triarc Companies, Inc. Triarc beneficially owns approximately 10% of the outstanding common stock of MCM. In connection with the issuance of the Senior Notes, MCM issued warrants to the institutional investor and Triarc to acquire up to 428,571 and 100,000 shares, respectively, of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share. The warrant agreements pursuant to which the warrants were issued contain antidilutive provisions which, as of March 31, 2001, have resulted in warrants to purchase an additional 5,241 shares of common stock being issued to the lender and warrants to purchase 1,275 shares of common stock being issued to Triarc. In addition, we paid Triarc a fee of $0.2 million in consideration of Triarc’s guarantee of this indebtedness. An independent valuation firm was engaged to determine the allocation of the $10.0 million principal amount between the Senior Notes and the warrants. The results of the valuation were such that the value of the warrants was approximately $3.05 per share. This valuation of $3.05 per share results in the warrants being included as a component of stockholders’ equity in the amount of $1.6 million with the same amount recorded as a reduction of the $10.0 million note payable. This $1.6 million debt discount is being amortized as interest expense over the five-year exercise period of the warrants and has a remaining balance of $1.5 million at March 31, 2001. The Senior Notes require semi-annual interest payments each January 15 and July 15 except that during the first two years the Senior Notes are outstanding the interest may be repaid in kind at the Company’s option through issuance of additional 12% Senior Notes due July 1, 2005. For each of the interest payments that were due in July 2000 and January 2001, the Company issued 12% Senior Notes in the amount of $0.6 million, respectively. The board of directors of MCM approved the issuances of the Senior Notes and related transactions, and the members of the board of directors of MCM unaffiliated with Triarc approved the payment of the fee and the issuance of the warrants to Triarc.

  Secured Financing Facility

      On December 20, 2000, MRC Receivables Corporation, a wholly owned, bankruptcy remote, special purpose entity, entered into a $75 million secured financing facility. Notes to be issued under the facility will be collateralized by the charged-off receivables that are purchased with the available proceeds from this financing arrangement. As of March 31, 2001, borrowings under the secured financing facility were $4.4 million. The assets pledged under this financing facility, together with their associated cash flows, would not be available to satisfy claims of our general creditors.

  Stand-by Line of Credit

      Effective October 31, 2000, we executed an agreement with certain of our affiliates for a $2.0 million stand-by line of credit secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets and its subsidiaries. The facility may be used for working capital purposes. The line of credit accrues interest at 12% per annum on any amount drawn on the line of credit and repayment would be due in 12 equal monthly payments of principal with any unpaid principal due no later than twelve months after the end of the funding period. As of March 31, 2001, the funding period has been extended through June 30, 2001, subject to two additional three-month extensions

9

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

at the option of the Company through December 31, 2001. Upon execution of the agreement, the lenders received warrants to acquire up to 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.01 per share. Additional warrants are issuable at such time that we draw against or extend the funding period under the line of credit. As of March 31, 2001, we issued warrants to purchase 100,000 additional shares of common stock in connection with the extension of the funding period through June 30, 2001. At March 31, 2001, the Company had not drawn any funds against this line of credit.

      See Note 3 for information relating to our securitization transactions and warehouse facility.

Note 6 — Comprehensive Loss

      The following is a summary of the components of comprehensive loss (in thousands):

      The unrealized gain is a result of the Company’s 1998 Securitization. At the time of securitization, the retained interest was initially recorded at the basis allocated in accordance with SFAS 125. This original cost basis was adjusted to fair value, which is based on the discounted anticipated future cash flows on a “cash out” basis, with such adjustment, net of related deferred income taxes, recorded as a component of other comprehensive income.

Note 7 — Loss Per Share

      The weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in the calculation of basic and diluted loss per share were 7,191,131 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2000 and 7,161,131 for the three months ended March 31, 2001. The shares used in the calculations of basic and diluted loss per share are the same in both periods since all potentially dilutive securities (stock options and warrants) would have had an antidilutive effect.

10

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Introduction

      This “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MCM Capital Group, Inc. (“MCM” or collectively with its subsidiaries, the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2000 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. A general description of the Company’s industry and a discussion of recent trends affecting that industry are contained therein. Certain statements under this caption may constitute “forward-looking statements” under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Reform Act”). Such forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements express or implied by such forward-looking statements. For those statements the Company claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Reform Act. See “Part II — Other Information.”

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended March 31, 2001 Compared with Three Months Ended March 31, 2000

  Revenues

      Total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2001 were $8.7 million compared to total revenues of $7.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2000, an increase of $0.8 million or 10%. The increase in revenues was the net result of an increase in income from receivable portfolios of $0.5 million; an increase in servicing fees and related income of $0.1 million; and a net increase in income on retained interest of $0.2 million.

      Income from receivable portfolios increased $0.5 million or 15%, to $3.8 million from $3.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The average outstanding balance of our investment in receivable portfolios decreased $33.5 million to $26.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2001, compared to $59.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2000. The decrease is principally due to our determination during 2000 that twenty-two of our receivable portfolios that had been acquired during 1999 and 2000 were not performing in a manner consistent with our expectations and historical results for the specific type of receivables within those portfolios. Accordingly, we recorded a provision for impairment totaling $20.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2000. In addition, we ceased accrual of income on these portfolios effective January 1, 2000 with all subsequent collections being applied to reduce the net carrying value.

      As successor servicer to a pool of charged-off consumer accounts acquired in May 2000, Midland Credit receives a servicing fee for collections of these receivables. We recorded $2.2 million in servicing fees during the three months ended March 31, 2001 for the collections on these receivables during that period.

      In connection with the 1998 Securitization, we recognized income from retained interest in securitized receivables in the amount of $2.5 million, servicing fees in the amount of $1.5 million and amortization of servicing liability in the amount of $0.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2000. During the three months ended March 31, 2001, we recognized income from retained interest in securitized receivables of $2.7 million. As a result of the repayment of the notes under the 1998 Securitization in September 2000, the remaining balance of the servicing liability was amortized in 2000 and we no longer record servicing fee income with respect to these portfolios. All collections are applied to the principal and interest of the retained interest.

  Total operating expenses

      Total operating expenses were $10.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2001 compared to $9.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2000, an increase of $0.6 million or 6%. We recorded a provision for portfolio losses of $2.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2000 as a result of

11

Table of Contents

  Other income and expenses

      For the three months ended March 31, 2001 interest expense was $1.9 million on average borrowings for the quarter of $55.1 million reflecting an effective interest rate for the period of 14%. For the three months ended March 31, 2000, interest expense was $1.9 million on average borrowings of $58.9 million reflecting an effective interest rate of 13%.

  Income taxes

      For the three months ended March 31, 2001, we recorded an income tax provision of $0.3 million which represents the deferred tax impact of the decrease in the unrealized gain related to the securitization of receivable portfolios discussed in Note 3. For the three months ended March 31, 2000, we recorded a benefit of $1.5 million, reflecting an effective rate of 40%.

  Net loss

      The net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2001 was $3.7 million compared to a net loss of $2.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2000.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

  Overview

      We depend on both internal and external sources of financing to fund our purchases of receivable portfolios and operations. Our need for additional financing and capital resources increases dramatically as our business grows. Our failure to continue to obtain financing and capital as needed would limit our ability to acquire additional receivables and to operate our business. Additional financing, additional capital or sales of certain receivables for cash may also be needed if we are removed as servicer of receivables that are either part of our outstanding securitizations or are owned by third parties.

      On December 20, 2000, through a wholly owned bankruptcy remote, special purpose entity, we entered into a $75.0 million secured financing facility to be used for the purchase of receivable pools. As of March 31, 2001 there was $70.6 million remaining under the line. Moreover, we extended the maturity date of our $15 million revolving credit facility to April 15, 2002. We use our $15.0 million revolving line of credit for working capital needs and draw and repay the revolving line of credit on a regular basis. We had $1.8 million available under this facility at March 31, 2001, as compared to $2.1 million available at year-end. In addition, at March 31, 2001, we had cash of $1.7 million, as compared to $0.9 million at December 31, 2000. For further information regarding the Company’s credit facilities and securitizations, see Notes 3 and 5 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included herein and “New Secured Financing Arrangements and Servicing Issues” below.

12

Table of Contents

  Cash Flows and Expenditures

      We collected $16.4 million in the first quarter of 2001 from owned and serviced portfolios, an increase of 19% from the $13.8 million collected in the first quarter of 2000. During the three months ended March 31, 2001, we collected $5.4 million on the portfolios included in the 1998 Securitization, all of which was retained by the Company. During the three months ended March 31, 2000, the Company collected $7.3 million from the same portfolios, but retained only $2.1 million. In this regard, we made the final payment on the debt outstanding under the 1998 Securitization on September 11, 2000. All collections since repayment are applied against the principal and interest of the retained interest.

      Our primary investing activity is the purchase of new receivable portfolios. We purchase receivable portfolios directly from issuers as well as from brokers that represent various issuers. In addition, from time to time, we enter into forward flow contracts under which we acquire pools of receivables over a specified period of time at fixed prices from the same issuer. We purchased $4.9 million in new receivables during the three-month period ended March 31, 2001, up 40% from the $3.5 million purchased in the first quarter of 2000.

      Purchases affect cash flows in two ways. In periods in which we make purchases, we use cash to fund the “equity portion” of the purchases, as described below. In later periods, recoveries on the portfolios produce cash flow. Even though our purchases in the first quarter of this year were up over the same period of last year, they fell short of our budget for the period. Accordingly, while this allowed us to preserve cash in the quarter, it will affect future cash flows. We are aggressively evaluating portfolios to identify purchases that meet our selective targeted return profile.

      We use proprietary statistical models to determine values of new portfolios, with minimum expected returns set by management. During the first quarter of 2001, the Company purchased four portfolios from three issuers that we believe will meet our targeted returns. There is no assurance that we will be able to continue to find portfolios that meet our targeted returns criteria.

      From time to time, we also sell receivables of bankrupt debtors in the normal course of our business. We received $0.5 million from these sales during the three-month period ended March 31, 2001. We did not sell any receivables in the first quarter of 2000, as we were prohibited from doing so under the prior terms of our lending arrangements.

      Net cash provided by financing activities was $1.7 million in the first quarter of 2001, which included the repayment under existing facilities and capital leases of $3.8 million, offset by borrowings of $5.5 million used primarily to fund new portfolio purchases. Net cash provided by financing activities was $11.8 million in the first quarter of 2000. During this quarter, we entered into Securitization 99-1 and used the proceeds primarily to repay debt under the warehouse line of credit, to fund new portfolio purchases and for operating activities.

      Capital expenditures for fixed assets and capital leases were $100,000 and $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The decrease reflects the completion of our new Davox call management system installation and other hardware and software to support this system. During the three months ended March 31, 2001, purchases of capital expenditures were funded with internal cash flow. During the three months ended March 31, 2000, capital expenditures were funded primarily from bank borrowings, capital leases and recoveries on receivable portfolios.

  New Secured Financing Arrangement and Servicing Issues

      On December 20, 2000, MRC Receivables Corporation, a wholly owned, bankruptcy remote, special purpose entity, entered into a $75 million secured financing facility. This loan facility is used to acquire pools of charged-off receivables. The credit agreement requires us to provide the lender with specific information concerning the pool and the proposed terms of the acquisition. Once the lender approves the purchase, the lender loans to us ninety percent of the funds necessary to complete the purchase, together with any associated costs. Each loan is evidenced by a single promissory note and is collateralized by the receivables in the pool and cross-collateralized by any other pools of receivables securing other loans made by the lender. We are required to provide ten percent of the purchase price as an “equity” contribution. After repayment of each series of the Notes, and repayment to us of the equity contribution (including a return on our equity), the

13

Table of Contents

      As indicated, in order to utilize this facility, we need to generate sufficient cash to fund the equity portion of the purchase price (10%) not financed through the facility. We generate our cash flow from our interests in certain receivables pools, our residual interest in the 1998 Securitization and from servicing fees. Currently we are on month to month status as servicer of our Securitization 99-1 and warehouse facility. In this regard, we are not in compliance with the cumulative collection covenants of these agreements and have been reappointed as servicer for both Securitization 99-1 and the warehouse facility through May 31, 2001. In addition, we are required to maintain a specified amount of net worth to obtain funding under our secured financing facility. As of April 30, 2001 we did not satisfy this requirement, however we received a waiver from the controlling party on May 15, 2001.

      If we (through our subsidiary Midland Credit) are able to continue as the servicer under our warehouse and securitization facilities, and to utilize our various credit facilities to continue to purchase receivables and fund working capital requirements (which would require waiver of anticipated future defaults), we believe that we will have sufficient liquidity to fund our operations and working capital needs for the foreseeable future. However, if we are removed as servicer or are unable to utilize our credit facilities, the Company might need to: (i) sell certain of our receivable portfolios for cash, (ii) raise additional capital, (iii) reduce the number of employees and overall scope of operations, (iv) reduce any future capital expenditures, (v) cease purchasing additional receivables, or (vi) under the worst of circumstances, pursue strategic alternatives such as a sale, merger or recapitalization of the Company or Midland Credit or seek protection under reorganization, insolvency or similar laws.

  Contingencies

      See Part II, Item 3 for information about certain litigation contingencies.

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

      The retained interest in securitized receivables is treated as a debt security similar to an available-for-sale security and is carried at fair value. At the time of securitization, the retained interest was initially recorded at the basis allocated in accordance with SFAS No. 125. This original cost basis is adjusted to fair value, which is based on the discounted anticipated future cash flows, with such adjustment (net of related deferred income taxes) recorded as a component of other comprehensive income. On a quarterly basis, management reviews the fair value assumptions which are based on the current cash flow projections discounted at an effective rate that reflects a current risk-adjusted rate of return that a knowledgeable investor would require. Changes in short-term interest rates also affect our earnings as a result of our borrowings under the revolving credit facility and the warehouse facility.

      We believe that our market risk information has not changed materially from December 31, 2000.

14

Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

      This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Reform Act”). The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” or the negation thereof or similar expressions constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Reform Act. These statements may include, but are not limited to, projections of revenues, income, or loss, estimates of capital expenditures, plans for future operations, products or services, and financing needs or plans, as well as assumptions relating to these matters. These statements include, among others, statements found under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” For all forward-looking statements, the Company claims the protection of the safe-harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Reform Act.

      The Company’s actual results could differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, some of which are beyond the Company’s control. Factors that could affect the Company’s results of operations or financial condition and cause them to differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements include:

      Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statement was made. They are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which we cannot predict or quantify. Future events and actual results could differ materially from the forward-looking statements. We will not undertake and specifically decline any obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events, whether as a result of new information, future events, or for any other reason.

      In addition, it is our policy generally not to make any specific projections as to future earnings and we do not endorse projections regarding future performance that may be made by third parties.

Item 1 — Legal Proceedings

      There are a number of lawsuits or claims pending or threatened against Midland Credit. In general, these lawsuits or claims have arisen in the ordinary course of our business and involve claims for actual damages arising from the alleged misconduct of our employees or our alleged improper reporting of credit information. Although the outcome of any litigation is inherently uncertain, based on past experience, the information currently available to us and, in some cases, the possible availability of insurance and/or indemnification from the originating institutions, we do not believe that any currently pending or threatened litigation or claims will have a material adverse effect on our operations or financial condition.

      In February 2001, in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, County of Maricopa, our subsidiary Midland Credit Management, Inc. and two of its wholly owned subsidiaries, Midland Funding 98-A Corporation and Midland Receivables 99-1 Corporation, filed a lawsuit against MBNA America Bank, NA

15

Table of Contents

      We do not believe that contingencies for ordinary routine claims, litigation and administrative proceedings and investigations incidental to our business will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Item 2 — Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds

      See Note 5 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 Financial Statements, which is incorporated by reference hereto. The sale of the notes and warrants described therein was exempt from the registration provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, under section 4(2) of the 1933 Act for transactions not involving a public offering, based on the fact that the notes and warrants were offered and sold to a limited number of institutional investors who had access to financial and other relevant data concerning the Company, its financial condition, business, and assets.

Item 6 — Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

      (a)  Exhibits

           None

      (b)  Reports on Form 8-K.

           None

16

Table of Contents

MCM CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: May 15, 2001

17